Отзывы о Гуру

Who believes that GURU is rewarded by casinos for good reviews?

Wer glaubt das GURU von den Casinos für gute Bewertungen belohnt wird?

Hi, what makes you think we should be paid for reviews? Do you think it would be worthwhile and would we help players in such a big way? I think probably not so much, but feel free to give your opinion and we can have a debate about it.

Yes, they fake it.

You get paid for such reviews.

Do you do this for free?

Ja,sie fälschen es.

Sie erhalten Geld für solche Bewertungen.

Machen Sie das kostenlos?

Yes, we are reviewing casinos for free and almost daily my colleagues reject any forms of compensation offered by casino representatives for "adjusting" the Safety Index. 🙂

So there are offers of compensation after all.

That's what I suspected.

You should use real players who have real experience.

Your platform can do a lot to raise awareness among players so they don't get carried away.

There are many casinos that simply send SMS messages that cannot be blocked.

Also gibt es doch Entschädigungsangebote.

Das habe ich vermutet.

Ihr solltet echte Spieler einsetzen, die echte Erfahrungen gesammelt haben.

Ihr Plattform kann vieles erreichen um die Spieler zu sensibilisieren,damit sie nicht gesamten werden.

Es gibt viele Casinos die einfach SMS senden die mann nicht blockierten kann.

No, you did not understand, I am afraid. The second chance, if you don't mind:

I mentioned that casinos have tried to pay out to improve the indexes, but all suggestions are always rejected because we do not do that. 🙂

We use players' experiences - hence comes the user rating. You know I understand this idea quite well; the general opinion is that a bunch of hardcore players would be capable of perfect reviews. We go the way of investigating complaints instead, and I understand it is not acceptable to everyone.

So, feel free to consult just the user rating here. Choose the option that best suits your needs.

Yes, but the user rating has nothing to do with your rating.

They rate it way too highly compared to what users rate.

I think they don't understand.

Ja aber die Nutzer Bewertung hat nichts mit euren Bewertung zu tun.

Sie bewerten es viel zu hoch gegenüber was Nutzer bewerten.

Ich glaube sie verstehen es nicht.

E.g. My Empire Casino your rating over 9

Most users have negative reviews.

How do you get 9

Zb.My Empire Casino eurer Bewertung über 9

Die meisten Nutzer haben negative Bewertungen.

Wie kommen sie dann auf 9

Hello, I believe you already answered the question. Our ratings are called the Safety Index because the aspects included in the formula are purely data-based markers. User reviews, on the other hand, are unproven user opinions or experiences and are thus not included in the Safety Index.

Many players don't know that the Safety Index doesn't measure how quickly you get paid or your chances of winning; it only indicates whether you can eventually collect the winnings.

Something like that can't be calculated based on user reviews, I'm afraid, yet I get that this way does not suit everyone.

So users are unimportant?

Also sind die Nutzer unwichtig?

Nope, they are.

But I hope you can consider the other aspects too: such experiences are not measurable when talking about user reviews. We cannot verify every user review because they often reflect personal feelings. But it's always been a key part of the casino homepage, and the user feedback is there.

The Safety Index is a proven, data-based value, unlike what you may know from other sites reviewing casinos. We have our own process.

Even though it may look different based on the forum posts, complaining about things the casino is obliged to do does not belong in the user review. You may do so on the forum, of course.

I mean, would you consider this a user review for example?

"False advertising and bogus bonus rules stay away is a scam has been blacklisted on other sites" How would you adjust the Safety Index based on such a user score?

That's the problem we are facing when it comes to the user reviews; hence, those are kept aside from the Safety Index, which is primarily based on the following aspects:

1) Size of the casino

2) Player complaints—proven facts collected from the players and casinos

3) Deductions for restrictive or unfair practices

4) Points added for positive qualities

5) Related casinos

Those points have the potential to provide a clue to whether the casino would be willing to pay out the winnings, which is the point of the Safety Index.

Well, I'm sorry for another extensive answer. 🙏

GOLDENPLAY CASINO

9.5

They have no support, how is that possible?

So come on be a little more objective

GOLDENPLAY CASINO

9,5

Die haben kein Support wie soll das möglich sein.

Also kommen Sie seien sie ein bisschen objetiver

Hmm, I think it's clearly stated in our review that they don't have live chat. Not every casino has to be facilitated with it. It's not the best, but it's not completely unusual either. 

However, this is not something that should sink a casino in terms of safety index.

How is the height assessed?

But payments?

If you have to wait days for a response, is that worthy of a high rating?

Wie erfolgt dann die Höhe Bewertung?

Doch Zahlungen?

Wenn mann Tagen auf Antwort warten müss ist das die höhe Bewertung würdig?

Hello, did you see the review details, please? It is not saying how quickly you get paid because it may vary a lot. Please consider the Safety Index as a measure of safety, not speed. 🙏

I bet you didn't know.

I fully support you.GURU Really takes money from the casino for good reviews.Very often they have inflated artificial ratings for casinos. Therefore, they take money from the casino for good reviews.

Guru can't be trusted. They are completely corrupt.

Hi, I see you have a clear and quite combative stance.

Can I ask what happened to you? Whatever it is, we can always talk about it calmly and with a cool head. I think this thread actually shows that. I am here if you need anything.

Oh my 😀 well, they probably don't have that money (money that serves as the essential pillar of all online casino review sites when the review site has gained enough fame and visitors that its opinions and reviews start to affect the reputation of the casinos themselves and the winning percentages of their money-grubbing shareholders (or similar long-term profit-earners).

Now think about why market some never heard crap as the number one casino with 40x wagering requirements which practically means that even if you win a good amount, due to the very fair nature of the casino you will get x number of free spins when you give them your information, which will 100% definitely be sold on so that other casinos (as well as other random parties as long as they have the motivation to buy citizens' data) can bombard this naive person with weekly "VALID TODAY ONLY" free spins ads that will get you into the same trap but the deposit money will just go to a different vault.

ÖÖh 😀 no tuota, tuskimpa he sitä rahaa (raha joka toimii kaikkien nettikasinojen arvostelija sivujen olennaisena tukipilarina siinä kohtaa kun arvostelusivu on saanut tarpeeksi mainetta ja kävijöitä jotta sen mielipiteet ja arvostelut alkavat vaikuttamaan itse kasinoiden maineeseen sekä heidän rahanahneiden- osakeomistajien (tai vastaavan pitkäkyntisten) tuoton saajien voittoprosentteihin.

Ajattele nyt, miksi markinnoida ykkös kasinona jotakin never heard sontakasaa jossa 40x kierrätysvaatimukset joka käytännössä tarkoittaa että vaikka voittaisitkin hyvän summan saamillasi, kasinon todella reilun luonteen vuoksi saatu x määrä ilmaiskierroksia kun luovutat heille tietosi, jotka aivan 100% varmasti myydään eteenpäin jotta muutkin kasinot (sekä muut random osapuolet kunhan heillä vain on motivaatiota ostaa kansalaisten dataa, saavat tätä naiivia henkilöä pommittaa viikottaisilla "VOIMASSA VAIN TÄNÄÄN" ilmaiskierros mainoksilla jotka saavat sinut samaan ansaan mutta talletusrahat vain menevät eri holviin.