Вопрос об азартных сайтах с лицензией Кюрасао, использующих неверный код категории продавца. (Страница 1 071)

Gitlid- mydates ltd https://grottobook.com/

A word to the wise:

Cool pic

Literes/literese

Onlgno

They will provide false evidence. Cool: digital images, Literes: online courses or subscriptions, and Onlgno: Standoff skins.

Aviso a navegantes:

Cool-pic

Literes/literese

Onlgno

Aportarán pruebas falsas. Cool: imágenes digitales, literes: cursos o suscripciones online y onlgno: skins de standoff.

Dotablitz are as follows https://dotablitz.com/ sole director also https://gankcore.com/ look up dotablitz on companies house web site for director details, only partially refund me, saying they could not find another transactions. The are on action fraud which is worth mentioning. Reply with your email I will help if I can.

Nitrowin is Elmst limited and Slotzy Elvel limited. Although it is the same company at its core, they operate under two different licenses. Unfortunately!

Nitrowin är Elmst limited och Slotzy Elvel limited. Även om det är samma bolag i grunden så verkar de under två olika licenser. Tyvärr!

anyone have for AZURE PAY?

Can you provide mail to onlgno?

What kind of merchant is Literes?

I've never been able to find it. I only know it's in Liverpool.

Che commerciante è Literes?

Non sono mai riuscito a trovarlo. So solo che è a Liverpool

Anyone help with Valthx London?

What do i say to the bank, what did i try to buy? They also ask for proof of order and coversations with the merchant. No clue what to say or do

Still looking for IMGVIBES if anybody has any information?

If there is no way to contact the business, use a made-up generic email address (for example: support@[businessname].com) and post your complaint there so that there is a record that you have tried to contact them without success.

When you file a chargeback with your bank, be sure to mention this point:

The business lacks real customer service channels and operates with total opacity, something unacceptable in any legitimate digital provider.

If it's not possible to identify exactly what the business sells, always analyze the MCC (Maintenance Customer Compliance). Most online stores operate with digital services.

If the MCC indicates Leisure, it usually refers to digital products, video games, or online entertainment services.

If it says Education, it usually refers to digital courses or training.

If Services appears, it usually refers to online subscriptions or intangible digital products.

If the bank asks for an invoice, clearly explain that the merchant never provided an invoice, confirmation email, or any payment information, which is completely irregular.

And the key conclusion is this:

You know perfectly well that the business did not deliver anything, therefore it is the business that now has the burden of proving otherwise.

With well-structured allegations and explaining the total lack of traceability, the business will not be able to provide any valid evidence, because it simply does not have any.

Best of luck, my friend. This is the strongest way to defend your position.

Si no existe ninguna forma de contactar con el comercio, utilice un correo genérico inventado (por ejemplo: support@[nombrecomercio].com) y exponga ahí su queja para que quede constancia de que ha intentado comunicarse sin éxito.

Cuando haga el contracargo ante su banco, mencione precisamente este punto:

el comercio carece de canales reales de atención al cliente y opera con total opacidad, algo inadmisible en cualquier proveedor digital legítimo.

Si no es posible identificar con exactitud qué vende el comercio, analice siempre el MCC. La mayoría de comercios pantalla trabajan con servicios digitales:

Si el MCC indica Ocio, normalmente son productos digitales, videojuegos o servicios de entretenimiento online.

Si indica Educación, suele tratarse de cursos digitales o formación.

Si aparece Servicios, lo habitual son suscripciones online o productos digitales no tangibles.

Si el banco pide factura, explique claramente que el comercio nunca proporcionó factura, ni correo de confirmación, ni información alguna del pago, lo cual es completamente irregular.

Y la conclusión clave es la siguiente:

usted sabe perfectamente que el comercio no entregó nada, por tanto es el comercio quien tiene ahora la carga de demostrar lo contrario.

Con alegaciones bien estructuradas y explicando la falta total de trazabilidad, el comercio no podrá aportar ninguna prueba válida, porque simplemente no la tiene.

Muchísima suerte, amigo. Esta es la forma más sólida de defender tu posición.

In their defense against my chargeback, they presented evidence of digital courses: an online programming course subscription, a virtual server configuration class, etc. But at no point did they disclose their website or domain. Many of these businesses simply don't have any operational platform; only their cunning in fabricating evidence can save them from having to refund their money.

En su defensa contra mi contracargo presentaron pruebas de cursos digitales. Subscripción online de curso de programación. Virtual server configuration class.. etc. Pero en ningún momento declaran su sitio web o dominio. Simplemente muchos de estos comercios no tienen ninguna plataforma operativa, solo su astucia inventando pruebas les puede salvar de que devuelvan su dinero.

The online retailer ONLGNO provides no verifiable information about its website, its business activities, or its online presence in its defense. This already indicates that, most likely, they do not have a real platform or a functioning customer service department. Their "defense" is extremely weak: they simply list alleged skin names and manually include expressions like "used" or "activated," without any technical traceability, access logs, or any objective proof that the service ever existed or was provided.

Given such a weak defense, lacking valid documentation or supporting evidence, the chargeback mechanism is entirely appropriate and will allow you to recover your money without difficulty. Good luck! 🍀

El comercio ONLGNO no aporta en su defensa ningún dato verificable sobre su web, su actividad ni su presencia online. Esto ya indica que, muy probablemente, no disponen de una plataforma real ni de un servicio de atención al cliente operativo. La "defensa" que presentan es extremadamente pobre: se limitan a listar supuestos nombres de skins y a incluir expresiones como used o activated de manera manual, sin trazabilidad técnica, sin registros de acceso y sin ninguna prueba objetiva que demuestre que el servicio existió o fue prestado.

Ante una defensa tan débil, sin documentación válida ni elementos probatorios, el mecanismo de contracargo es plenamente procedente y le permitirá recuperar su dinero sin dificultad. Mucha suerte 🍀

have u managed to find hupeiwe email?

Have u managed to find Hupeiwe email?

Does anyone know who these are?

inntus (London)

tecseigm (London)

coksh (London)

myior (Ardrossan)

sclpted (Tallin)

I looking for them too.

Found this on Google, banks should have been aware then? If I’m having no luck with PayOp & Santeda should I raise a complaint with bank for allowing this & not intervening? Some days there was 20+ to PayOp & Santeda & loads of non sterling transactions fees

Did you ever find out who?